I have been reading several articles and blog posts the last while on the approvel process for Open XML in various countries. These include Open XML – US V1 Committee Vote and IBM Motivations, Microsoft guns Open XML onto ISO fast track, and Open XML Suffers a Setback on the Road to ISO Ratification . Setting aside the name-calling, accusations, insinuations and other vitriol which seems to pervade all discussion involving Microsoft and the open source world, I would like to better understand what the technical justification of ODF over Open XML might be (or vice versa). While I would not claim to be a technical expert in either format (though I know Open XML much better than ODF), the main arguments I have seen in favour of ODF are:
- It got here first
- It is not from Microsoft
I do not see either of these as useful arguments. Can anyone out there point me to real, meaningful, technical reasons why one is better than the other?
Thanks for the pointers – I look forward to reading them over the weekend!
LikeLike
Here’s a start…
http://www.fr0mat.net
Here’s a conclusion….
Click to access up7-6Hiser.pdf
LikeLike